Sex with a robot: height of geekery or straight-up cheating?
By Emily




(5 votes)
Related Entries
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
It came frum the Internetness .. again!
Some things Robots shouldn’t be forced to do
Mmm more big bots, now in Terminator edition.
Greater Quantifying Theory of Sexual Enjoyment, Part 2
A robot? Nope. Thats the same as a vibrator or dildo. Its just a machine that does a purpose. This one being sexual gratification.
Androids, on the other hand, thats a stickier situation. (heh heh sticky). Androids are more human like and may even have personalities, so that’s where the stumbling block comes from. If you could buy a Jennifer Love Hewwitt droid and bang her all night, why would you go through the hassle of dating? Why work on your relationship if you can get a hummer from your Katherine Heigal bot? Not to put to fine a line on it, but men work on relationships to receive sexual pleasure and meet our emotional needs at the same time. Or to get baked goods. We can go either way. If the Jolie bot is stroking my ego, as well as my johnson, then it would be providing all that many men would need from their partner, so that in my humble opinion, would constitute cheating. Its not the sex that makes it cheating, but the withdrawal of affection and the need of one partner for another that they are getting from another.
0.o jimmyboy, did you just re-enact a scene from austin powers?
er…
Well I have more disturbing discussions in this field. you have to consider several factors…
1- Is the bot self-aware?
2- *scrreeeeech*
hold one a second.
“then it would be providing all that many men would need from their partner”
wow, I just found out im not covered under “many men”.
nevertheless…
2-emotional connectivity
can you actually have a relationship with a machine?
This answer does not depend on whether the machine can have a relationship with you (self aware) as I proved when discussing a friends love of the idea of a fictional woman.
The idea of cheating -*threewayideathought*-whoa…where’d that one come from… O.o ...well, to cheat I think could be covered under two kinds; the sexual and emotional. for “many men” emotional can be a very shallow thing. I could go into more detail but I’ll probably break my complex logic map made out of tinkertoys at this point…
just to be safe JimK, dont seduce any bots until we get the jury in on this one.
-Lion
The better question to ask is, would it still be cheating if it WASN’T a sexual relationship? What if you like to spend more time “talking” and hanging out with a synthetic intelligence? Does that count as emotional cheating?
As far a sex cheating goes, I think anytime you’re doing somethin sexual and you’re keeping it from your partner you’ve got a problem. Call it cheating or not. It doesn’t matter in the long run because when they find out it’s going to hurt them just the same.
Honestly I don’t think you can just simply answer this one yes or no. It depends on the people in the relationship, what they consider cheating, how open are they, and other things of that nature. Plus it depends on the machine. Is it just a plain machine with no thoughts or feelings, or is it a true AI capable of thought and emotion. There are so many things to consider that it’s going to depend on the thoughts of the actual people involved, much like cheating in general.
As always Futurama has the answers:
http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/48647/detail/
i think the more interesting situation arises if say your wife ir girlfriend wasnt ok with say a Jolie bot, but was ok with a robot that was modeled after her on the theory that if its her likeness/personality its modeled after and her body its not cheating, just an elaborate masturbatory aide.
but then say, you and your S.O. have a fight one day and you seek comfort in the arms of your Stepford Girl - is that cheating? Or say your SO isnt into certain things, but you can program the copy to be, the theory being well she wont go for this, but pseudo-she will. So there are grey areas.



Emily: Jim, I have a question for you.
JimK: I may have an answer.
Emily: That is my intent, to pose an interrogative statement designed to elicit a response.
JimK: How about you just ask?
Emily: All right. As posed by Asylum, is sex with a robot sex toy cheating or not?
JimK: Good question. Impossible to answer, though. Double standard applies.
Emily: What do you mean?
JimK: Well, it’s not only acceptable, but almost required that a woman own at least one vibrator. The range and styles available are astounding. There are ones that jackhammer in and out, g-spot curves, little ones, giant ones, twisting ones, ones that are designed for all three closely-located pleasure centers down in the business area, rechargeable, ones that require a wall plug or a small nuclear reactor…it’s honestly like car shopping. Too many choices.
But it’s all perfectly accepted and OK. I should also clarify that I have zero issues with women using vibrators and in fact appreciate the assist on occasion.
Emily: So what is the problem?
JimK: If a guy wants even one fake something-or-other in which to jam his business end, he’s weird. Go ahead. Ask every vibrator-owning woman you know. If they are really being honest, no matter how many mechanical devices they themselves are proud to own and will freely admit to using…if hubby or boyfriend has a single rubber stroker he’s weird and it’s creepy. God forbid he has a molded porn star vagina.
Emily: I am not sure I understand female meatbags in this case. This seems like a hypocrisy of the highest order. It flies in the face of logic.
JimK: Welcome to humanity, kiddo. Men have their fair share of quirks, to be sure, but being illogically hypocritical when it comes to sexual matters? Women have been confusing men with that little quirk since the first pair walked upright.
Emily: That is all well and good, Jim, but how do you feel? Is it cheating?
JimK:
I fall on the “I don’t really think it’s cheating” side of the fence. With qualifications, though. Like, my wife would have to approve of the model and the programming. Hell, I’d feel really odd if it had personality, although I suppose you’d want some level of interaction and autonomy.
Hmm. A programmable sex robot. You know, I suppose I really could enjoy that…
Emily: Excuse me while I raise the level on my main cooling system. I seem to be overheating for some unknown reason.
JimK: Unknown? You’ve been trying to find a way to bang me for three years. I’m telling you that in theory I wouldn’t consider a robot sex doll cheating.
Emily: Please stop. Normally I would love to hear this but my…heat…levels…
JimK: You want me to stop talking about how I would program delicate tacticle responses into your simulated body so that when I gently brushed my lips against your mechanical nipp…
Emily: STOP. FULL STOP. SYSTEM OVERLOAD. WARNING: PLEASE REBOOT SYSTEM TO CONTINUE
JimK: Uh-oh. I think I broke her. OK, quick reboot time, so I’ll throw it open to the Awesomeites: Sex with a robot; cheating or no?
06/28/2008 2:22 PM
Categories: Tech
Tags: weird