Review: Star Trek XI

By Rann
54321 (1 vote)

Rann:  First off, I must begin this review by issuing a preemptive apology to John Cho.

John seems to be quite a talented young actor with a great ability for understated emoting and comedic timing and presentation, as well as nuance of more serious and complex emotional presentation. I think he has a bright future in the industry and will go far, both with the role of Hikaru Sulu and the ever-expanding possibilities available to Asians in US cinema, and he deserves more than to constantly be pigeonholed and identified by one of his earliest and silliest roles.

That said, I’m going to be merciless with the Harold and Kumar jokes if it is within my power.

Second, this review will contain spoilers and indeed, at several points is likely to segue into mini-synopsis territory.

Third, dammit movie stop having Spock involved in makeout sessions. This isn’t a nerd thing where my childhood heroes need to remain pure and chaste and above petty temptations of the flesh, because my childhood Trek was actually Next Gen… it’s just a characterization thing. Leonard Nimoy was exceptionally proud of the job he did in creating the Spock character, and many of the difficulties he had with both Roddenberry and other studio figures were in keeping the integrity of the character. Spock making out isn’t beyond the realm of characterization plausibility, but having him do it in public in front of strangers just because he’s going on a dangerous mission is BS, even if he’s young.

Anyway, that out of the way, let’s move on into the actual movie.

The movie starts off with one of the more improbably-designed ships in Trek to date coming through a wormhole or something, and yes, I’m aware that that’s saying a lot as pertains to Star Trek’s ship design. But anyway, it starts blasting the hell out of a ship that is soon handed over to a Commander Kirk, whose name is eventually revealed to be George. George has to do the heroic piloting-the-ship-on-a-collision-course thing, made somewhat more poignant by talking to his wife and naming his newborn son in the seconds before he dies, and made disappointingly less heroic by the fact that we have to see his body get flung forward and that his sacrifice basically does jack shit all to the bad guys other than buy the escape pods time to, um, escape. I know the escape pods were like the entire point, but still.

We move forward in bits and pieces, the movie deciding to eschew giving us years or even startdates to help distinguish between flash-forwards. It’s only a minor nitpick, as it’s not absolutely necessary… it’s easy enough to get a general idea of how much time has passed, however the characters’ ages being left a little nebulous does detract slightly from this being where we’re supposed to get to know them. It does, however, prove that no matter what iteration you’re writing, what version, when it’s original series based, Star Trek is about Kirk and Spock. We’re shown Kirk and Spock’s childhoods, insight into them growing up and joining Starfleet… everyone else is introduced in cute little segments surrounding them by turns, basically serving to provide support and to a great extent humor to these two’s story. It’s Kirk and Spock’s show and everyone else is just background flavor. It’s a much more nuanced and strong flavor than it used to be, though, and some would likely contend that yes, it IS Kirk and Spock’s world and everyone else is just livin’ in it, so that’s only appropriate. Plus, showing us the childhood of every single eventual command crew member would take forever.

But as mentioned, Kirk grows up never knowing his father, and constantly acting out and getting in trouble with the law. It’s sort of an odd transition… Kirk, the mischievous corn-fed Iowa boy with a twinkle in his eye is reimagined into basically being implied trailer trash (as much as such a thing can exist in the Star Trek future), with a stepfather or mom’s boyfriend who clearly resents being saddled with the extra baggage of a child because he wants the kid’s mother, getting in trouble with the cops and having little to do with his life or little ambition other than hanging out at the local dives and obsessing over whatever hot girl he comes across. While it certainly adds more depth to the character, again it’s up to you to decide if it’s depth you actually wanted. I’m a little torn on the subject personally. While it makes him more realistic and more sympathetic, it certainly does reduce the idea of him as just being some utterly heroic figure because that’s just plain who he is, and it definitely leans the character interpretation of Kirk much more heavily towards the “swaggering man-child in a uniform” interpretation than the “grinning ne’er-do-well out to right wrongs and boldly go” one. Of course, much of my preferences for Kirk are tied heavily into William Shatner’s portrayal in the movies, not the series, so it may as well just be a different character to me, and oh well, that’s how he is.

Eventually as things start gearing up, we see more of the villains too. The villains are… well, again I’m torn on them. They’re decent in design and the way they act and all, but they’re supposed to be Romulans and there’s very little about them that’s Romulan. At all. I guess the excuse is that these are miners (… IN SPACE!), and are to be seen as more salt-of-the-earth than regular Romulans, but it just doesn’t fit. The reasons for them being identified as Romulans seem to be purely for kind of shallow story reasons… the dynamic of Romulans vs. Vulcans, and because they’re an “old school” Trek race instead of a new one. It’s like the writer or director wanted to create an entirely new tattooed goth angsty villain race for the movie, but then someone stepped in and said “Let’s make them Romulans”… and so they were made Romulans, basically by just doing a search-and-replace on their race name and giving them pointy ears.

Nero is also possibly the least well-imagined and fleshed-out Trek villain ever. He’s pissed off because his pregnant wife died? Seriously, Trek, how often are you going to beat that dead horse? Whenever you’re making a villain in Trek, there are two things you need to ask yourself. “Did Voyager already do this one?” and, if the answer is yes, “Can I do it better than they did?” Considering that this was the motivation of one of the few really good villains in Voyager (who, by the way, ALSO traveled in time), it’s like they asked these questions, then just shrugged and kept him as he was while really half-assing him. The wife and child are given no development other than their existence, and Nero himself grunts and growls and sulks and half-heartedly rants his way through the movie. It’s like no one involved with the character really cared. I suppose in a way it speaks to the rest of the movie’s strengths that, while Trek episodes and movies can often be defined and made or broken by the quality of their villains, this one is actually good in spite of a villain that could very well have been replaced by any random Klingon spitting out hackneyed villain cliches, since that’s basically what Nero is without the bumpy forehead.

And Vulcan gets destroyed. Nero commits genocide because of his tantrum over his plot device, I mean, dead family. That’s a pretty big “whoa”, right there. It also makes me wonder what some people were thinking when they gushed over how bright and optimistic this movie is compared to the Trek movies made within the last eight years, but not really, because I know exactly what they were thinking and it’s a subject we don’t bring up here. This Trek movie is playing for keeps. Kirk’s dad dies, a bunch of ships get blown up, Spock’s mother falls to her death right in front of his eyes, an entire planet is destroyed and the Vulcans reduced to an endangered species of about 10,000. And absolutely none of this is magically-temporally fixed before the last five minutes of the movie for a super-happy-ending and a return to the status quo. If anything it wouldn’t be that hard to see this as the sort of universe that could turn into Admiral Tiberius of the Human Empire, though obviously it’s not. It’s serious and it’s tough and it’s not fucking around.

Actually, I think I can sum up the movie’s high and low points in a single sentence. Excellent character writing, sub-par story writing. The characters, with a few exceptions (the aforementioned Nero) are well-fleshed-out and realistic, and come across very well. They display traits of nuanced character writing that are encouraging and make you interested in them and eager to see more of them. The story, on the other hand, has a heavy tendency to lean on “coincidence”, telling rather than showing, random plot points dropped and a bit of a seeming rush job in some areas. The character interaction and the strength of the characters is enough to pull the story up and make it not only watchable but fun and enjoyable, but the story itself is pretty weak.

The characters make the movie, though. Harold, having eaten too much White Castle and being propelled through the fabric of space-time by an epic case of Hawaiian roll and pot-induced diarrhea, has assumed the name of Hikaru Sulu and enrolled in Starfleet. Unfortunately, a hippie future and access to the food synthesizers has done nothing to curb his ganja habit, and he’s slightly stoned when putting the ship in warp and forgets to take off the parking brake for one of the movie’s many deus ex coincidences. Yes, seriously. Luckily, at some point in his trip through space-time, he stopped by the future of the Matrix, and they stuck a plug in his head and uploaded “fencing”, which actually seems to be a rather badass mix of European swordfighting, kendo, and kickboxing. This did, however, result in Sulu Prime furrowing his brow and intoning in his deep, lovely voice, “He seems to be using ka-ra-te. Have I ever said or done anything to lead you to believe that I might practice ka-ra-te?”

Uhura is finally given something to do other than sit there with a stupid dongle in her ear and alert Kirk to incoming transmissions, and it luckily stopped short of turning her into the sort of bad-ass Mary Sue that some attempt to make her into in a misguided attempt at women’s lib, good at everything and just slightly more intelligent than Spock. She’s got exceptional hearing and a skill for languages, and knows three dialects of Romulan, which is a fairly far cry from the Uhura that needed everyone else’s help and a bunch of hardcopy books to try and speak Klingon. But it’s nicely within her range and speciality, and fits for her, so it comes off as her just being awesome, rather than her being THE MOST AWESOME THING EVER!!!! as it could have been. (IE, they didn’t feel the need to have her step in and flawlessly beat the crap out of somebody with random martial arts just to prove how tuff she is, that sort of thing.)

Chekov seems to be channeling a tiny bit of Zack from Bones, just without the apprenticeship to a murdering cannibal. I thought the stressing of his accent was a little overblown, down to having him struggle with his passcode because it had “Victor Victor” in it, to be a tad juvenile and in slightly bad taste, but it wasn’t a huge big deal or anything. It did immediately make me think of Walter Koenig rolling his eyes and muttering “Nuclear wessels” at Fry’s hassling him in the episode of Futurama, tho.

Bones (the Starfleet medical doctor, not the forensic anthropologist) is almost creepy, and I’m sure that somewhere, DeForest Kelley is looking down on Carl Urban and grinning. The only strange thing about him is that he seems to ride up and down the scale of being obviously older than Jim and playing the almost uncle figure to him, to being about the same age and being his boyish partner in crime. I think part of that may just be the cadet uniforms, putting both of them in those brought them down to the same age, I’d almost have said it was a better idea to have him in a separate “Starfleet Medical” uniform that looked more like scrubs or something. But his role is dead-on, coming off as an exacting portrayal of the same character, rather than either a wholly different character or just a really good impression, as some of the other characters come close to. It’s probably the best casting job out of a lot of good casting, and the best acting job out of a lot of good acting.

Scotty is probably the most flat-out fun of the character reimaginings. He’s basically Peregrine Took on risers and stuffed into a Starfleet uniform, and it is awesome. Seriously, I don’t know how else to really describe him, save with that same boundless enthusiasm and endearing goofiness.

I think Zachary Quinto’s only real problem with portraying Spock (aside from possibly having more makeout sessions pushed on him by the studio trying for sex appeal and not yet having the clout to tell them to go stuff it) is that, unlike Leonard Nimoy, he didn’t have the time to work himself into this character. While he has the benefit of watching all of Nimoy’s acting previously, and most likely the benefit of Nimoy himself’s advice, there’s just a certain amount of manner and delivery that you have to be able to accustom yourself to. Nimoy got to do that over developing Spock during the first season. He went from occasional outbursts such as “THE WOMEN!” to the understated, solemn nuance we all came to know so well. Quinto hasn’t had time to find that balance yet, since it’s his first rodeo wearing the ears, but I think given time he’ll either find that groove or his own version of it.

The action scenes are well-done and well-choreographed, with lots of imaginative geography and creative use of three dimensions. The on-foot firefights definitely hold to a greater scale of realism and speed than any Trek battles before, and are shot and acted almost like any movie you could cite about a modern war; Kirk and Spock could just as easily be dodging bullets in Iraq as phaser blasts in a Romulan mining ship. It definitely adds a lot to the tension and gripping feel of it, as a lot of Trek on-foot battles before, even the pretty decent ones, are fairly sedate, involving a lot of sitting behind cover and talking things out before trying something wacky and/or heroic and ending things in five seconds.

The movie’s definitely not the mythical “perfect” Trek movie, it’s probably not even going to be the best movie of the summer season, but it is extremely good. Barring being completely and unexpectedly blown away by Wolverine, I’d say save the time you’d use rolling your eyes at Barakapool and see Star Trek twice.


Rate this post:
1 2 3 4 5


05/10/2009 6:21 PM
Categories: Movies
Tags: ,,,

Related Entries
Halloween Post: Fridge Fright
Futurama: Beast With a Billion Backs
To boldly expand the universe
Sam Raimi to direct World of Warcraft movie
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen


Comments

1   supercore wrote:

muttering “Nuclear wessels” at Fry’s hassling him in the episode of Futurama

I’m sooooo glad I wasn’t the only one.

He’s basically Peregrine Took on risers

He reminded me of nothing so much as David Tenant’s Doctor Who. Except with a Scottish accent. Which David Tenant actually has. So why didn’t they just cast David Tenant?

The biggest problem for me was the Romulan ship. I mean, I get that it’s big. Fine. Mining operations have always used some of the largest and most badass machines for their work since steam power was invented. Fine.

So why does it have a ridiculous complement of badass weapons that can take down a full on warship? Metaphorically, That’s like pitting one of those huge tunneling machines against a tank. Yeah, The tunneler would be BIGGER, but there’s no reason for it to have offensive weapons. At least, No reason was given. And a shot or two from a tank would be lights out no matter what.

Other than that though, Quite enjoyable. Not the best one, but better than I think anyone could have expected that’s for sure.

United States   05/11 at 01:49 AM  

2  Gerbera Tetra Gerbera Tetra wrote:

Warts and all this is still the best Trek movie ever.

I really didn’t think as much about the ‘dead wife’ villain drive as the ‘dead homeworld’ since he mentioned the former once and the latter every time he got the chance! [hell she didn’t make the death speech -_-]

In any case, yea its pretty bad ass.

United States   05/11 at 03:43 AM  

3  Gerbera Tetra Gerbera Tetra wrote:

The biggest problem for me was the Romulan ship. I mean, I get that it’s big. Fine. Mining operations have always used some of the largest and most badass machines for their work since steam power was invented. Fine.

So why does it have a ridiculous complement of badass weapons that can take down a full on warship?

Two Words-

Klingon Empire

But seriously, I can only chalk it up to Romulan paranoia.. and Klingons..

United States   05/11 at 03:44 AM  

4  Joe R. Joe R. wrote:

Second, this review will contain spoilers and indeed, at several points is likely to segue into mini-synopsis territory.

Movie reviews were written for decades without giving away the film (although trailers frequently did and still do).  Although I do appreciate the warning, I’d really like to be able to use the internet to see what similarly minded people thought about a film I’m considering seeing.  So I didn’t read the review and skipped right down here.  Is it possible to get a second, spoiler-free review up?

United States   05/11 at 04:29 AM  

5  buzzion buzzion wrote:

So why does it have a ridiculous complement of badass weapons that can take down a full on warship?

Well, the thing is I don’t think it does have badass weapons.  Its a mining vessel from 300+ years into the future.  Let’s give you the most basic of today’s weapons systems and send you back 300 years and we’d probably have you conquer the world.  So I think its probably just got the most basic of weapons systems for its time which are incredibly advanced for the past.  I mean Spock does some decent damage with that little science ship when he hijacks it back and that doesn’t have very powerful weapons either, but they are on the equivalent level of the Romulan ship.

United States   05/11 at 08:39 AM  

6  Rann Rann wrote:

Is it possible to get a second, spoiler-free review up?

Nope.

While I understand your view and myself find it annoying sometimes when all there are are spoiler-reviews, Jim has specifically and repeatedly told me that I’m under no obligation to avoid spoilers in my reviews. Considering that pretty much everything actually interesting about the movie… the changes to the characters, the backstory and motivation of some of them… could be considered spoilers, then the non-spoiler review would boil down to:

“Yeah, it was really good. Not perfect, but really good.”

United States   05/11 at 09:58 AM  

7   Miguelito wrote:

We’re shown Kirk and Spock’s childhoods,

Best thing I saw in the credits… “Vulcan Bullies”  Hah.

And Vulcan gets destroyed. Nero commits genocide because of his tantrum over his plot device, I mean, dead family.

Yeah, it was a plot device and all, but it wasn’t just his wife, it was also his whole damn planet.  So it was a tit for tat thing in a way.  Of course, he seemed to ignore the fact that it likely wasn’t going to keep Romulus from eventually being destroyed anyway… they kinda ignored that whole point.  But I think that’s also kinda the point: He was basically driven insane.  I also found it made a little more sense when you eventually find it had pretty much just happened from his point of view and that they were thrown into the past by random chance vs my initial assumption that they’d done it on purpose and had just missed where they wanted to be.

And absolutely none of this is magically-temporally fixed before the last five minutes of the movie for a super-happy-ending and a return to the status quo.

I’m actually glad they’re leaving it different as it has a lot of possibilities to allow for change.  I was almost cringing near the end wondering if they were going to hit the magic reset button too, and am glad they didn’t.

Excellent character writing, sub-par story writing.

Yeah, pretty much agree.  This “rebooted” universe has a lot of potential though.

random plot points dropped

Like the whole “red matter” stuff.  But keep in mind.. this is a trait of Abrams.  He’s said in numerous interviews that he likes to leave things open ended rather then try to explain every single thing out.

Scotty is probably the most flat-out fun of the character reimaginings.

I loved that he had basically had been assigned to the ass end of space, like the cliched “you’ll get assigned to an outpost in Alaska” used in movies and TV in present day stuff… literally.  I also liked all the little nods to the previous series’ like Scotty having been given said lame assignment for testing his transporter theory on Admiral Archer’s pet Beagle (poor Porthos).  Hearing where “bones” came from made me chuckle too.

but having him do it in public in front of strangers just because he’s going on a dangerous mission is BS, even if he’s young.

Yeah, I was a little off put by that, but considering it wasn’t just that.. I mean, his home world (or 1 of 2 considering what he’d just said) was destroyed, the other was about to be.. there was a good chance he was going on a suicide mission, and his mother just died in front of him (like you mentioned).. it all adds up.  It could mean they’re going to have him even less in control of his emotions over time due to the changes in the timeline too.

United States   05/11 at 04:08 PM  

8   Miguelito wrote:

But seriously, I can only chalk it up to Romulan paranoia.. and Klingons..

Not to mention the 130 years of advanced technology separating them.  Shield tech alone was probably enough to make it withstand WAY more hits.. and it really only had one weapon.. some form of multiple warhead torpedoes.  Also as mentioned.. they’re Romulan.. they’re paranoid as hell already and they’re mining in space, you gotta have more protection if you’re able to go out there vs just being near home.

United States   05/11 at 04:13 PM  

9   Miguelito wrote:

To boldly reboot a franchise that Scott Bakula helped fuck up before.

I must be one of the only people that doesn’t hate on Enterprise.  Yeah, the first 2 seasons weren’t all that good, but I liked 3 and 4.  I really thought the writing in season 4 was pretty inventive, circling back and actually making cool stories that linked with ones from the other series.

Then again, I also liked most of Voyager too, and people rip on that.

Of course, I tend to like any 1/2 way decent scifi anyway.. there’s so little of it even offered out there.  I’m willing to look past a lot of shortcomings if there are some good points here and there.

United States   05/11 at 04:18 PM  

10   supercore wrote:

But seriously, I can only chalk it up to Romulan paranoia.. and Klingons..

I thought the events of the future took place after the Klingons had made peace with the Federation in Trek VI.

As far as Romulan paranoia, it’s a good point. Being a non-trekkie though I had a hard time understanding it while I was watching the movie.

Again though, small gripes.

United States   05/11 at 11:35 PM  

11  West Virginia Rebel West Virginia Rebel wrote:

Miguelito: Hey, you and I agree on something! smile

I liked the Mirror Universe episode of that show myself. I think the show lacked direction until the Xindi story arc and it improved after that.

I like the fact that Kirk isn’t necessarily a heroic swashbuckler when he’s first starting out. It’s kind of like what Smallville did with Superman-by showing his faults and flaws, it made us understand the character a lot better while still making him one of the ultimate good guys later on.

United States   05/12 at 10:23 PM  

12  West Virginia Rebel West Virginia Rebel wrote:

PS With regards to the Vulcan bullies…it reminds me of one of the episodes from the animated series (which seems to be the Forgotten Era of Trek) where young Spock was teased by other Vulcan kids…the fact that I remember that makes me a Star Trek nerd, I know.

United States   05/13 at 05:57 AM  

13  Rann Rann wrote:

Ah yes, that would be the episode where Spock’s big fuzzy Vulcan pet dies.

United States   05/13 at 09:49 AM  

14   Miguelito wrote:

Ha ha.. sadly, I recall that animated ep as well.  I remember that, one where they were miniaturized, and I could swear there was one where they passed through into a negative universe or something.

United States   05/14 at 03:38 AM  

15  West Virginia Rebel West Virginia Rebel wrote:

BTW, Spock and Uhuru??? That one threw me for a loop somewhat…

And then there was Chekov trying to get the computer to recognize his access code…McCoy’s green-blooded hobgoblin remark…

So what happened to the timeline? Does the original we all know and love exist in a parallel universe now?

And what happens to the Romulans if they somehow find out what happens in the future? Do they go after the remaining Vulcans and start a war in revenge?

What about Spock? Does he stay in the past or find some way home?

Did Nero really die? He got sucked into that thing pretty fast…

So many questions, so many sequels to resolve them in…

United States   05/14 at 11:59 PM  

16  buzzion buzzion wrote:

McCoy’s green-blooded hobgoblin remark…

That does seem pretty consistent.  Bones always did have somewhat of an antagonistic relationship with Spock.

So what happened to the timeline? Does the original we all know and love exist in a parallel universe now?

Technically yes.

And what happens to the Romulans if they somehow find out what happens in the future? Do they go after the remaining Vulcans and start a war in revenge?

I think a possible storyline is a war erupting between the Romulans and Klingons with the Federation getting involved due to Nero’s destruction of the Klingon vessels.

What about Spock? Does he stay in the past or find some way home?

My guess is that yes Spock will remain in the past.  If he were to travel to the future it would be one he would not recognize due to the changes in the timeline.  In order for him to actually return it would involve his crossing paralell universes which wouldn’t exactly be very easy.

United States   05/15 at 12:58 PM  

17  Rann Rann wrote:

Plus he has to stick around and help this timeline’s Vulcans rebuild.

I’ve heard some people rage over this movie “undoing” the previous timeline, and originally I feared this myself, until Gerbera Tetra pointed out to me they specifically said “alternate timeline” in the movie.

Also, traditionally, in Trek time travel has been done via the slingshot effect, specific temporal phenomenon, or some all-powerful being. Gravity-based disturbances (like, y’know, the black hole) seem to lead to dimension-hopping more often (such as the Mirror Universe).

United States   05/15 at 04:25 PM  

18  West Virginia Rebel West Virginia Rebel wrote:

Hmm. Maybe we see improved relations between the Federation and the Klingons much earlier…

I would like to see what the 24th century looks like with a much smaller and less influential Vulcan population…no Tuvok? Maybe they’re refugees in Picard’s time, being driven from world to world.

United States   05/16 at 03:13 AM  

19  Rann Rann wrote:

It would definitely be a radically different dynamic for sure. Despite various yammering in canon sources about humans being such an overwhelming presence in the Federation, it seemed like the Vulcans were a close second. (In fact, it strikes me as odd that the Vulcans, having been space travelers for centuries longer, didn’t have more offworld colonies.)

In Sisko’s time, there were Federation ships with all-Vulcan crews. (Which seems to me a little discriminatory, if you think about it. What happens if a human requests a posting there, a very logical “Get lost, redblood”?) There probably wouldn’t be enough Vulcans and certainly not enough Vulcans in Starfleet for that to happen anymore.

United States   05/16 at 11:52 AM  

20  chrisbg99 chrisbg99 wrote:

I saw the movie Friday and really enjoyed it.

I liked the gag early on with Kirk making out with the green alien chick.

United States   05/24 at 01:15 AM  


Post a Comment:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.