My Own Worst Enemy cancelled in self-fulfilling title prophesy

By JimK
54321 (2 votes)

JimK:  Well, My Own Worst Enemy has been canceled.  The word is that the currently-shooting ninth episode will be the last.  So why did this show fail, aside from what seemed to be a total lack of promotion outside of the network after its debut?  I have a couple theories.  SPOILER WARNING: Like it matters, this show is canceled, but I may spoil plot elements below.

Theory 1: The basic premise made no sense at all.  Why do the real people, who are the super spies, need to be switched to cover personalities that don’t know they are fabrications?  What is the purpose of the cover?  To protect the knowledge of the spy?  That could be easily accomplished without the whole switchover by implanting the chip with a small amount of explosives.  Spy is in danger of giving up vital intel?  Spy goes pop.  Given the fact that the spies go into missions fully aware, and they get captured, the information contained in their heads is not safe at all.  The cover life of Henry Spivy was completely and totally tacked on to accomplish the Jekyll/Hyde conflict between Edward and Henry.  Fundamentally it made no sense to do this.  Yes it was somewhat interesting to watch them leave little phone videos for each other, but it never really worked as a literary device.  The British show Jekyll did that about a million times better and more organically.  It made sense in that show.  This show never passed the basic smell test once you started thinking about the premise too much.

Theory 2: While I maintain that Slater did an excellent job distinguishing between the two characters, Henry was written in a cliched, simpering wimp TV husband manner, and it was actually unpleasant and annoying to watch.  The show came alive when it was an action/spy show and Slater was playing Edward.  When he was Henry it dragged.  I woudl much rather have watched how Christian Slater would play an oversexed, over-adrenalized spy like Edward inside the confines of having to be normal.  Lots of room for a whole caged animal thing there.  Also?  Spivy’s son looked half Italian and half Hawaiian.  Come on, casting directors.  I know you can’t make actors look that much like they are related, but the idea that those two people produced a dark-haired, dark skinned kid is ri-god-damned-diculous.  Maybe not eveyone would name that as a fatal flaw, but subconsciously everyone sees scenes with the family and can feel something is well and truly off.  It breaks the reality, and a show like this cannot afford to let the viewer think too much about the reality of the world it has created.

Theory 3: The show was too “television.”  Everything was written like TV is.  people talked funny, situations were too pat, most things that happened were kind of expected, and the show very much followed a formula. 

Theory 4; a lack of attention to detail.  Example: There was one little thing they established early on from the pilot; When agents go in the box in the cover company, a woman speaks a phrase into her wrist com: “_so and so_ is in the box.”  Henry and Tom always said the same things to her: “You say that every time, why?”  And she;d smile and say “You ask that every time…”  Well, in the fourth episode another agent went in the box, and when the woman spoke her phrase into her wrist com, “Ellen” the agent didn’t say anything…they just cut to the downstairs scenes and out of the elevator walked spy “Paula.”  Little details like that help sell a world as real, and lazy television writers (and terrible TV directors and editors) love to leave those little details out.  Either because they are hacks, they don’t understand their craft or they just don’t care.

So how could they have fixed this show before it ever aired?  Fairly easily, in my ever-so-humble opinion.  Drop the entire idea of switching personalities.  Make it a straight-up spy thriller show.  Edward is always Edward.  His cover life exists so that he has somewhere to land when not on mission and a reason to be flying around the world, with a full, real, verifiable identity to back him up.  The problem would be, he’s a super spy with an over-active libido and a need for danger…so the conflict is there naturally between his home life and his day job.  You could bring the tech stuff in by establishing that when the spies come off mission, they get mundane memories of day trips and business meetings implanted so that when they talk about these events in their cover lives they believe them.  In fact in *my* pilot, I would establish that Edward’s wife can always tell when he is lying.  The bad guys don’t…but for some reason that could be explored later, Wifey always knows. So when Edward comes off mission, they give him memories he believes are real.  When he comes back to work he gets flashed with a set of real memories.  More natural areas that can generate conflict: some memories leak in Edward, no one knows why, also someone is deliberately introducing odd memories and flashes of things that Edward has never done…or has he?  The Saffron Burrows character plays very much the same role: monitoring the psyche of the agents to make sure that no cracks form between all of this memory switching.  and speaking of her…

Another element that might have saved this show in week 2 would have been to spring the surprise of Saffron Burrows being an active field agent (and Edward’s squeeze) for both sides of the company.  People love beautiful female ass-kicking characters with accents.  Well…by people I mean specifically me, but I know I am not alone, which is why Milla Jovavich and Angelina Jolie have movie careers outside of standard dramas.  They should have handed Burrows a gun at the end of week 2 and never wasted my time with a storyline about a dress and a refrigerator.

So now they’ve ruined TV for Christian Slater.  I’ll bet that guy doesn’t get within ten feet of a TV script again.  Which is a shame, because he was holding the show together on sheer willpower alone.  Given a great story and a good producer and direction he’d make some really excellent TV.  Hopefully I’m wrong and he’s being pitched some kick-ass new FX series or something on Showtime.

And lastly, like everyone else writing about the demise of this show, I am compelled to say that in the end, My Own Worst Enemy was in fact, its own worst enemy.  Four episodes in and as a fan of the show I was picking it apart.  No wonder it lost 42 percent of the pilot audience in a month.  None of this bodes well for Dollhouse, BTW, and neither does Fox putting Dollhouse on Friday night, the death knell for all scifi television.  We may as well say goodbye to the ever-improving Sarah Connor Chronicles as well, as it is also being moved to Fridays.

I swear I will never understand why networks and show runners make these terrible decisions and never, ever listen to the people that love and watch their programs….


Rate this post:
1 2 3 4 5


11/15/2008 4:22 PM
Categories: TV
Tags: ,,,,,,,

Related Entries
Making the case for saving #Dollhouse
Pay attention, Fox
Terminator will be terminated (?)
Siffy’s ad agency throws them under the bus
Screw it, I’ll speculate: #Dollhouse is cancelled


Comments

1  chuQue chuQue wrote:

I never did see any of my own worst enema ... partly because I kept calling it that and laughing.

I am not so sure dollhouse is dead before it starts, The genius/madness of Joss is he takes a terrible idea and makes a marvelous story from it (ie: cheerleader/ vampire hunter?  a western set in space, with real 6 shooters and horses even? .. etc)

So the fact that the premise of this series sounds too far fetched to work, kind of makes me think it may work for that same reason. Then who knows; the shows I really liked get canceled in their first season anyway ... except Pushing Daises ... Ohh wait ...


... In even worse news Pushing Daisies hasn’t been approved for it’s back 9 yet ....

United States   11/15 at 08:04 PM  

2  buzzion buzzion wrote:

I am not so sure dollhouse is dead before it starts, The genius/madness of Joss is he takes a terrible idea and makes a marvelous story from it

I don’t think jim is doubting the ability of the show to be good.  He’s doubting the choice for the timeslot.  He is right about Fridays being the death knell for the most part.  I mean the only sci-fi shows that do well enough on Friday nights are those on the sci-fi channel.  And let’s face it that’s cable and really is only attempting to attract the sci-fi fan audience.  For a network show to last it would probably need to pull in a larger audience.  Not to mention that on friday you will be competing with sci-fi channel for the same core fanbase on a friday night as well.  Fox is proving stupidity again.

United States   11/15 at 10:10 PM  

3  chuQue chuQue wrote:

He’s doubting the choice for the timeslot. 


I somehow missed that.  Is day/time really that important anymore? It seems a show’s success or failure is on whether it stays “above the line”  which is nothing more than an arbitrary number based on arbitrary data.

United States   11/16 at 12:29 AM  

4  buzzion buzzion wrote:

I somehow missed that.  Is day/time really that important anymore? It seems a show’s success or failure is on whether it stays “above the line” which is nothing more than an arbitrary number based on arbitrary data

I would say yes it is still important.  Ratings still do matter.  As do demographics.  And the key demographic tends to be the 18-35 year old bracket.  Those people tend to be going out on Fridays more.  You are also in essence competing movie openings as well on fridays.  Sure you might get some people to dvr the show.  But if its a show just starting out, you’re likely to get only the ones who are anticipating the show.  You won’t pull in the casual viewer that sees the show on its normal time and goes “Shit I need to keep watching this”

United States   11/16 at 01:21 PM  

5  chuQue chuQue wrote:

You have a point, but don’t the “networks” take all that into consideration when they set the line, or expectation for a show? I mean shows like numbers has been on the air for years always on a Friday night.

United States   11/16 at 04:26 PM  

6  buzzion buzzion wrote:

You have a point, but don’t the “networks” take all that into consideration when they set the line, or expectation for a show? I mean shows like numbers has been on the air for years always on a Friday night.

Yeah but we’re talking about Fox here.  CBS I think is more willing to give shows the opportunity to let shows find an audience.  And Fox has never been all that kind to Whedon, Minear, and Dushku.

United States   11/16 at 06:06 PM  

7   ErikTheRed wrote:

I generally assume that all network shows will suck until proven otherwise. As far as timeslot goes, how many people watch shows in real-time anyway. I DVR everything and I’m lucky to watch them within a week.

United States   11/16 at 06:21 PM  

8   supercore wrote:

I dunno, I’ve always thought of Friday and Saturday nights as “family” programming time. Probably cause I grew up when Family Matters and Step By Step and all that shit were ALWAYS on friday nights so I just expect it now.

As far as timeslot goes, how many people watch shows in real-time anyway.

If they’re going for the 18-35 demo, Yeah. Pretty much everybody in that demo has a DVR. Not everybody everywhere has one but that demographic most certainly has and knows how to use a DVR or bittorrent so maybe the point is moot after all.

United States   11/17 at 03:13 AM  

9   ErikTheRed wrote:

If they’re going for the 18-35 demo, Yeah. Pretty much everybody in that demo has a DVR. Not everybody everywhere has one but that demographic most certainly has and knows how to use a DVR or bittorrent so maybe the point is moot after all.

I think that might have been true at some point, but I don’t think it is anymore. I’m no longer in the 18-35 demo (gasp), and even my parents use a DVR now.

United States   11/17 at 02:10 PM  

10  buzzion buzzion wrote:

I’m in the 18-35 demographic, and I don’t have a DVR.  So while its not bad to think that most people in that group do have it, the ratings do still have some meaning.  And its still not a bad idea to put the show on a time that most of your desired viewers can sit down and watch and don’t have to DVR it.

United States   11/17 at 02:32 PM  

11  chuQue chuQue wrote:

Personally I have had a DVR for years ( had a series 1 Dtivo the week they came out)  So I see the argument for time slots being moot, however you are still “watching” at that time.

The big problem I think is with Network TV in general, They give away shows to sell commercial spots. and in the age of DVRs that is becoming a tougher thing to sell.  Here is hoping that Pushing Daisies doesn’t get the “de-rika” treatment ....

United States   11/17 at 05:42 PM  

12  West Virginia Rebel West Virginia Rebel wrote:

The idea of putting sci fi shows on Firdays is, I think, a holdover from the pre-VCR era. Joss needs to go over to the Sci Fi Channel if he wants this to work.

BTW, what about Life On Mars? It looks like that show may be gone soon as well, with its I-can-see-this-coma-plot-coming-from-a-mile-away storyline.

The weird part is, when Sam does wake up there might not be much of a difference between seventies New York and today the way things are going…

United States   11/19 at 01:44 AM  

13  Rann Rann wrote:

I think it may also be some sort of “legacy” from the original Star Trek… even though when Star Trek was put in a weekend slot, they considered it a death knell.

United States   11/20 at 02:13 PM  


Post a Comment:

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.